Bad Experience w/the 632 Ultimate Carry

Joined
Mar 28, 2022
Messages
122
Reaction score
257
I was really excited when this revolver was released, and I finally bought one. Oof, not good, gents:

1. The barrel is not in alignment with the frame -- see pic. Viewed from the rear, it's canted a few degrees counterclockwise.
2. Probably because of #1, point of impact is way to the right of point of aim.
3. The trigger doesn't feel right. Instead of the long, even double-action trigger I'm used to on S&W revolvers, this one is mushy to a hard wall, and then breaks crisply. I suppose this could be subjective, but not what I expected/wanted.

This gun is definitely going back to S&W, hopefully they make it right. Totally unacceptable QC failure for a revolver at this price point.1000034527.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
I never “order” a gun sight unseen for this very reason-a visual inspection up front can identify a lot of issues on the front end and keep you from getting an obvious dud. Hopefully Smith’ll make it right, but that should never have left the factory in that condition.

I don't know what prices and availability are like where you live, but if I never ordered a gun, I would have never had the opportunity to own a lot of my favorite guns, and I would have overpaid for the ones that I did manage to buy.
 
I don't know what prices and availability are like where you live, but if I never ordered a gun, I would have never had the opportunity to own a lot of my favorite guns, and I would have overpaid for the ones that I did manage to buy.
Same here. Not many stocking dealers close to me and they all tend to have the things. I haven't found an Ultimate Carry in stock anywhere to examine.
 
I also wish I could examine one thoroughly before buying. Here the local stores look at you like you're from outer space when you ask about revolvers.
 
One of the advantages of the two-piece barrel design used on these was supposed to be an end to improperly clocked barrels. The tab on the frame is supposed to fit into the slot on the barrel shroud for perfect alignment. I wonder how they already figured out how to mess that up.
 
One of the advantages of the two-piece barrel design used on these was supposed to be an end to improperly clocked barrels. The tab on the frame is supposed to fit into the slot on the barrel shroud for perfect alignment. I wonder how they already figured out how to mess that up.

I'm not much of a revolver guy and had no idea this was something I even had to worry about.
 
Back
Top
OSZAR »